Indeed, the question you're raising directly can't be put to me. However, I'm going to take the opportunity to tell you about things I can talk to you about, as I did to clarify the comments of today's guests, who in some respects didn't draw the necessary distinctions between levels of courts.
You say you want to talk about superior courts, and that's entirely all right. However, regardless of the court concerned, what hasn't been said today is that, if there is a delay, under the Criminal Code, in the case of a hearing that must be conducted in the language of the accused—because it's the language of the accused, pursuant to sections 530 and 530.1—or if the judge does not have competence or is absent, or if no one can give effect to the right, recourse is provided for in the Criminal Code. The Supreme Court was very clear on this point in Beaulac: there would be a stay of proceedings, release of the accused—