You have to draw a distinction between annual programming, which enables organizations to operate, and projects. In the case of projects, there have indeed been delays. We accept responsibility for the delays. In many cases, projects were filed in October. It took time for them to be analyzed and recommended. That's possible. We can vastly improve the turnaround time for projects.
However, with regard to programming, we have systems in place that enable the organizations... With respect to the organizations that say they aren't sure they will have the same funding, we can examine the data for the past three or four years. There hasn't been that much variation in the funding that the organizations receive for their programming. Sometimes, some receive less because the community itself says it isn't satisfied with their performance and that certain amounts should be transferred from one organization to another. That happens, but that may represent 5% of cases, at most. There's a big variation from year to year.