Evidence of meeting #37 for Official Languages in the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was report.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Graham Fraser  Commissioner of Official Languages, Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages
Catherine Scott  Director General, Policy and Communications Branch, Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages
Renald Dussault  Assistant Commissioner, Compliance Assurance Branch, Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Steven Blaney

Mr. Coderre, you have made your point, thank you.

Mr. Petit, please continue.

10:40 a.m.

Liberal

Denis Coderre Liberal Bourassa, QC

I have a supplementary point. Mr. Chair, I made a point of order, so I must continue along those lines. I want people to know that the official opposition fully agreed with the process suggested by Mr. Petit today. If he had voted with us, he could have asked that question, but since I have already been called to order and told that there was an agenda, the member should not be allowed to ask his question. So, I am asking the chair to stick to the agenda.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Steven Blaney

Mr. Coderre, I am trying to respect the agenda, but first I would like to hear Mr. Petit's question. I think that your comments have been noted. In any case, that had been made clear right from the start.

On that note, we will go on with Mr. Petit.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

Daniel Petit Conservative Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles, QC

Mr. Chair, I am going to send you my questions in writing, and you will have the opportunity to respond. As I said, I have two subjects: justice and an answer for my colleague Mr. Chong.

With regard to the Olympics, in fact, you have seen that a number of questions relate to the same situation. When Mr. Furlong appeared, one of my questions for him was simple. At the very least, will people be greeted at the airport in French? It is a first step, for a French national from Paris who comes here. If that person is spoken to in English, they will get angry and it will snowball. I understood that the airport was collaborating with VANOC. It was a first, when I heard the announcement.

You were there and I imagine that you have to travel to this airport from time to time. The Olympic Games will take place very soon, in 2010. Do you see it gradually becoming more bilingual, or will this only be for the Olympic Games?

You said something that I find interesting. I don't know whether it is just for the Olympics. I would like, and we will need, a follow-up, because we are investing money in this. As an individual and as a commissioner, have you seen a change at the airport?

10:40 a.m.

Commissioner of Official Languages, Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages

Graham Fraser

In fact, Mr. Furlong told me about an agreement. At that time, negotiations were on the way so that passengers arriving at the Vancouver International Airport will already be on a Olympic site. Consequently, all measures to ensure that an Olympic site functions in both official languages will apply to the Vancouver Airport.

Furthermore, I can share with you an anecdote. A passenger, who did not file a formal complaint, told me that there is still progress to be made with regard to bilingualism and posters or announcements in Vancouver. There is also a committee within the public service and there are already obligations.

I would say one thing. I do not want to talk about the tragedy that took place, but we can say that the incident that occurred in Vancouver has ensured that the airport is much more aware of the linguistic issue now than a year ago. Based on their effort to ensure linguistic duality at the airport, we will speak to other institutions, as Mr. Dussault said.

10:45 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Steven Blaney

Thank you, gentlemen.

We will now go to Mr. Gravel.

10:45 a.m.

Bloc

Raymond Gravel Bloc Repentigny, QC

I do not know if I am going to be able to ask my question, since it is not related to the Games in Vancouver.

10:45 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Steven Blaney

I hope that you will be allowed to ask the whole question first.

10:45 a.m.

Bloc

Raymond Gravel Bloc Repentigny, QC

Mr. Commissioner, earlier, you said that you would answer all questions related to the official languages. I want to backtrack a little bit. You said that you hope that the federal government would take advantage of the renewal within the public service to promote linguistic duality.

10:45 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Steven Blaney

Mr. Gravel, I do not know whether you are aware of this, but we talked about having two sections. First, you are going to end the section on the Olympic Games in Vancouver.

Mr. Godin, point of order?

10:45 a.m.

NDP

Yvon Godin NDP Acadie—Bathurst, NB

Out of respect for the member, we should let him ask his question in its entirety. Who says the public service has nothing to do with these Games? If the official opposition, which never votes in the House of Commons, wants to act like a baby this morning, it can, but we should let the member ask his question.

10:45 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Steven Blaney

Mr. Gravel, I can assure you that it was not—

10:45 a.m.

Liberal

Denis Coderre Liberal Bourassa, QC

Mr. Godin, your rain of insults is not getting through my umbrella of indifference.

10:45 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Steven Blaney

We will continue with Mr. Gravel.

10:45 a.m.

Bloc

Raymond Gravel Bloc Repentigny, QC

I am not going to ask my question, because it does not relate to the Olympic Games.

10:45 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Steven Blaney

Mr. Gravel, have you finished?

10:45 a.m.

Bloc

Raymond Gravel Bloc Repentigny, QC

I do not have a choice.

10:45 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Steven Blaney

We will move on to Mr. Godin.

10:45 a.m.

NDP

Yvon Godin NDP Acadie—Bathurst, NB

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I want to draw the Commissioner's attention to page 142 of his report. With regard to CBC, you stated in the second paragraph “[...]—and acknowledging—its obligations under the Official Languages Act.”

If I understand correctly, CBC has official language obligations. Mr. Commissioner, what are the two official languages in Canada?

10:45 a.m.

Commissioner of Official Languages, Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages

Graham Fraser

If I have read my terms of reference correctly, they are English and French.

10:45 a.m.

NDP

Yvon Godin NDP Acadie—Bathurst, NB

CBC is preparing a program about hockey in Punjabi and Mandarin. Are these two Canada's official languages?

10:45 a.m.

Commissioner of Official Languages, Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages

Graham Fraser

No, Mr. Chairman.

10:45 a.m.

NDP

Yvon Godin NDP Acadie—Bathurst, NB

I keep coming back to this matter and I do not intend to drop it. Regarding the Vancouver Olympic Games, the Société Radio-Canada has a mandate, an obligation towards us, which is to find solutions, because it is the only—let's admit it—broadcaster which broadcasts French programming throughout the country, including in regions where other broadcasters cannot do so. Based on my interpretation, SRC programming must reflect its official language obligations, in particular because it is our public broadcaster.

10:50 a.m.

Commissioner of Official Languages, Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages

Graham Fraser

Mr. Chairman, I will choose my words carefully.

We have a fundamental disagreement with the CBC and Radio-Canada regarding their responsibilities under the Official Languages Act, in particular Part VII of the Act, which obliges federal institutions to take positive measures to promote the development of minority language communities.

As for us, we claim that Radio-Canada, like any other federal institution, must assume its obligations, which Mr. Godin referenced. However, the position of Radio-Canada is that, as far as programming is concerned, it is solely accountable to the CRTC. This is a very fundamental disagreement. I asked to meet with Mr. Lacroix to see whether it would be possible to find a solution with regard to our conflicting interpretations. Whatever the case may be, our position is stated clearly on page 144.

10:50 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Steven Blaney

Thank you very much.

That completes this round of questions. I think we may have time for one or two additional brief questions before the end of the meeting.

Mr. Chong.