Let me finish. I see that Mr. Coderre and Liberal hypocrisy are in full swing today, because after you ruled that he should in fact stick to the motion, he just bulldozed right over your ruling and continued to talk about the Russell bilingual bylaw. Now, when another member wants to discuss it, he wants the microphones cut off and no debate on this.
Chair, we need to respect your ruling. So once again, as I say, it's the hypocrisy that we receive from the other end.
The point I'm making is that there are different levels of government, they do have different mandates, and they do need to be respected. I'm not suggesting that with Mr. Chong's motion we should be taking decisive action and ruling on exactly what's going on. In fact, there's an agreement that exists. I'm saying we should investigate that and we should listen to witnesses. That's completely different from what's going on with the Russell bylaw, where we have no agreement with the Township of Russell or with their bylaw.
Anyway, I did want to address those points, particularly the lack of logic from Mr. Coderre. I think I could find a good secondary institution that offers logic courses that might help Mr. Coderre with his future arguments.
Thank you.