I believe your amendment is in order. It is up to members of the committee to judge its relevance and assess its impact on the main motion, or determine if it deals with an entirely different subject. I will reread it.
Following the words “[...] explain why [...]”, would be replaced with “[...] explain the nature of federal-provincial|-territorial financial agreements on French language instruction (French as a first language and French as a second language).”
If members are ready, I will put the amendment to a vote.