I'm trying to understand. I'm starting off from the principle that, if we're able to have bilingual generals and officers, why not instructors? You don't think that would be advantageous. I think that it could; you could shift the instructors. It's important for them to be bilingual because these courses, as in the example you gave, are not just offered to anglophones.
On November 3rd, 2009. See this statement in context.