No. It depends if you want to be the meat in the sandwich or not, which I don't want to be.
In the end, Monsieur Nadeau raised the issue. I would submit to you this is a question that's posed to me in everything we do: mental health, ailing, the injured. You will always find these cases, even with the perfect system.
You see these kinds of cases even in a perfect system.
But the key is, what do you do with this? That's what speaks to action. What will be done in that case? And hopefully Monsieur Nadeau will give me the letter or at least provide a little bit more fidelity and granularity on the details, because that's the key. The leadership has to now take that, even in a perfect system.
We could be here perhaps--hopefully not--in five years, where individual cases will come up. They will, but the issue is not the case. It's what you do to resolve it, to get it sorted out. That's what we need to do.
So I think there are two issues you will see. You see the department, the Canadian Forces, with a plan that's moving ahead aggressively, and secondly, you see the leadership taking ownership of the plan.
That's the most important thing in my opinion.
It actually takes ownership of the plan and takes action to ensure that the plan is put into place.