Mr. D'Amours and Mr. Blaney, with your permission, I must tell you that I misled you. We're talking about a minimum number of “bilingual screening personnel” and an adapted number of “bilingual screening personnel” depending on the screening point. I gave an example: there were 10 bilingual persons in Ottawa. Pardon me if I misled you. Fortunately, my colleagues corrected me at the last minute.
You asked me an excellent question about the Olympic Games. May I go back to it? The program under which we are transferring 350 persons for the Olympics is a reward program for outstanding screening officers who have done a good job, who have served you in particular, who have served passengers in both official languages.
That said, since we've recruited them—a number of them are from the Maritimes because we have a lot of bilingual staff there—those officers are being replaced by bilingual people. We're going to offer the same adapted service at the screening points, which is greater than the limit of one per screening point. This is a program I'm very attached to. Too often people tend to belittle the work of the screening officers. It's very difficult, and we like to recognize those who—