I would like to add something. I'm looking at your committee. You are committed to linguistic duality and you prepare reports. We've seen the impact that you can have; we see it and we thank you for the rigour you show. You are the only committee that has demanded compliance with the act.
However, I must tell you that a number of reports prepared by the dedicated, brilliant and intelligent people who are seated here have been falling on deaf ears for years, since you have been in existence. I'm not criticizing any government in particular, but I'm telling you that your reports often aren't listened to.
And yet you put your hearts into it, your work, your commitment and your dedication. We find that terrible. The same is true in the case of the commissioner. He's there to say that he has investigated and that someone isn't right, or is right, because an investigation may be conducted and may not be founded. That's previously happened. However, if a complaint is deemed valid, why is it that no corrective action is taken? We're talking about a quasi-constitutional act that, 40 years later, is still not fully complied with.
That was an incidental remark on my part.