Mr. Chairman, the issue of the linguistic duality of the Olympic Games is very important. If I correctly understand the recommendation regarding the next agreements, it's that they are recurring and must be renewed at some point. My understanding of the original agreements is that they contain obligations. At the start of our report on the Olympic Games, we emphasize that, because of the agreement signed at the outset, there were linguistic obligations. We conducted our study on the Olympics at the start of the process because we didn't want to show up after the Games saying what should have been done. We identified the deficiencies that we were able to observe—