So it could pose a constitutional problem, since... We'll be looking at that in detail. I understand why you don't want to give me a final answer on the subject, but that may cause a problem. It can also cause the problem that Mr. Petit raised, that is to say that, if we in Quebec say that we're going to ensure that the provincial act takes precedence over the rest, that, for example, the anglophone community does not have the same rights under the Official Languages Act, then another province can say that the francophones of that province, as a result of that precedent, will not have the rights one would expect under the Official Languages Act either. That seems to me to be extremely disturbing. That's what troubles me greatly about the Bloc Québécois bill. I'm afraid that the other provinces will say to themselves that, since there is a precedent in Quebec, since Quebec has decided to standardize the law, since French comes first regardless of the employer, regardless of whether it is subject to the Official Languages Act, they can then decide to do the same thing. I assume that's a concern for you.
On February 26th, 2009. See this statement in context.