Yes. Going back to the very first question, earlier we were talking about assimilation and linguistic erosion, which are issues you rightly mentioned in your documents. I want to go back to what I previously said when I was talking about retention and you talked about the integration of newcomers.
This may be more of a comment than a question because you aren't decision-makers, but you're definitely thinkers. You're also practitioners in the field.
I think the entire dilemma is that we're inviting francophones to come and live in francophone minority regions while telling them that they will be living their lives in English. This is the entire Canadian dilemma in this area when you move away from Quebec, from Acadia in the northeast and the Ontario region bordering on Quebec. There's this whole difficulty. The message we send them is twofold and contradictory. We tell them that they are francophones and so much the better, but that they'll have to learn English because, otherwise, they won't be able to live in those regions and won't necessarily have jobs.
I'm aware of the fact that, for example, when we talk about the republic of Madawaska, of Caraquet, the part of the region of eastern Ontario that is closer to Montreal than to Ottawa, since demographics have also changed in that region, the French fact can exist. Perhaps you can have a little job in Hawksbury or Ste-Anne-de-Prescott if you don't speak French, but I'm not sure you get have a job if you don't speak English in Ottawa or even Orleans, which is one of the 11 amalgamated cities in Ottawa today.
I don't know how you do your promotion, but the contradiction definitely persists. You're telling francophones to come to Canada, that we're happy to have them in our communities, that they can speak French in their homes, but without forgetting that they have to learn English if they want to survive.