I will try to respond quickly.
First of all, we are discussing a complaint form. There will only be one form. If it is to be addressed both to the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages and to Air Canada, which way will it go?
Secondly, the Commissioner of Official Languages has the right to verify whether or not the complaint is valid before referring it to Air Canada. We are discussing complaints that come under breaches of the Official Languages Act. Normally, the Commissioner of Official Languages and his team will check on the complaint. If it is not valid, Air Canada will never hear about it. If it is, do not worry, Air Canada will be informed of it. The commissioner will work with Air Canada. This is the normal process for any complaint addressed to the commissioner, under the Official Languages Act.
I have already filed complaints with the Commissioner of Official Languages, copies of which I sent to Air Canada or to another party. Canadian citizens have the right to be able to complain to the Commissioner of Official Languages. Under his mandate, he is in a position to decide whether the complaint is valid or not. If it is unfounded, it stops there. In this instance, we are taking away the commissioner's responsibility to decide whether or not the complaint is founded.
That is why I cannot support the amendment. That should be an amendment and not the motion as such.