Thank you for the question.
You put in parentheses your remarks about the photographs in the annual report. Let me just say that I'm particularly proud of the work that was done in the presentation because it was done by our people, and they responded to my desire to stop buying stock shots of actors and actresses pretending to work in offices. So I think we have taken an important step in showing photographs of real people who really work for the federal government or really live in minority communities. But I will take into account your response, and we will possibly consult with Statistics Canada on the way we develop a sample for our investigations, and do a similar sample before we take photographs for the annual report.
More seriously, don't forget that the DesRochers decision applied to part IV of the act as opposed to part VII of the act. We haven't yet had a court test of part VII of the act. The first test of part VII is going to happen with our taking CBC/Radio-Canada to court. That may not be the big rendezvous because CBC/Radio-Canada challenges our jurisdiction. They argue that we have no jurisdiction over them at all; they are only accountable to the CRTC. The judge is first going to decide whether they are accountable to meet the requirements of the Official Languages Act at all, and if they decide that, then we'll have the real test of the obligations under part VII. But the DesRochers decision, which is an extremely important one, simply deals with services to the public.
So in terms of the degree to which I have been able to change corporate culture, I am probably more aware than anybody else of both the challenge and the shortcomings in the efforts to change the culture of federal institutions. That, to a large extent, is why we introduced this framework for analysis of managerial behaviour of these five necessary elements: to try to ensure that those five elements of knowledge, leadership, application of the plan, and evaluation become generalized across the board, so that we don't have this huge inconsistency between the application of the law in one institution and the application of the law in terms of one element and so that we see a more consistent approach across federal institutions.