Okay.
I have about two minutes left. So I'm going to make a brief comment. I know this is a bit complicated, but my colleague is going to ask more questions about it.
In DesRochers v. Canada in 2009, the Supreme Court of Canada identified some public safety issues. Does the Department of Public Safety intend to take the linguistic minority into account in providing services in the context of projects? In other words, does it draw a distinction between a natural application of the act and a symbolic application? I imagine that nevertheless makes a difference in the area of public safety.