When the bill was first announced, we took the issue to our board and supported that approach in principle, except that there has to be an implementation phase, and there are different ways of doing that. You can get a judge who comes in at 50% bilingual. They can be brought up within a period of six months. Or you can make that a binding factor even before the judge is named. That's what's not really clear, but the principle is something that we supported.
On March 23rd, 2010. See this statement in context.