It is important to be extremely specific about the obligations that have been respected or not before going before the courts. I think that Air Canada's experience before the courts was not a good one. If we remember the Thibodeau case where Air Canada appealed, the appeal court judge ruled that the carrier had the obligation to produce results. That said, with regard to intervening in Air Canada's corporate structure, we must be extremely cautious. That is why I believe it is extremely important to have a bill covering entities and not just ACE because, if we are to believe the rumours, it is quite possible that ACE will be dissolved in the coming weeks or months. It is essential to be extremely prudent before going before the courts, when dealing with an organization undergoing change.
On March 30th, 2010. See this statement in context.