Evidence of meeting #1 for Official Languages in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was chair.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Simon Larouche

8:55 a.m.

NDP

Yvon Godin NDP Acadie—Bathurst, NB

Does that include the notice of motions? I would like us to take a few minutes to read them.

8:55 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Michael Chong

So we have a motion on the floor right now to adopt the first nine routine motions that this committee had in the last Parliament. We'll have discussion now as to whether the committee wants to accept them as they were in the last Parliament or whether the committee wants to make amendments to these first nine routine motions. We'll have a discussion about that.

Members, I'm going to suggest that somebody move an amendment to this motion on the floor. As the clerk has pointed out to me, if you look at the second routine motion, that has to change. Currently it requires that the subcommittee be comprised of the chair, two vice-chairs, and a member of the “other” opposition party. But there is no other opposition party, so that has to change. We used to have three opposition parties on this committee, so you could have two vice-chairs and then a member of the third opposition party.

So we need to change that routine motion.

9 a.m.

Conservative

Guy Lauzon Conservative Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry, ON

Could we amend it to just say the chair and two vice-chairs?

9 a.m.

Conservative

Royal Galipeau Conservative Ottawa—Orléans, ON

No, that doesn't work.

9 a.m.

Conservative

Guy Lauzon Conservative Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry, ON

Why not?

9 a.m.

Conservative

Royal Galipeau Conservative Ottawa—Orléans, ON

Because, in a way, it hands control over to the opposition. We have a majority government in the House, on the committee and on the executive committee.

9 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Michael Chong

I will make the suggestion that the subcommittee be comprised of five members: the chair, the two vice-chairs, the parliamentary secretary, and a member of the government. What that means in the subcommittee is that the chair would.... There would be two vice-chairs, the parliamentary secretary, and a member of the Conservative Party. So then you'd have three government members and two opposition members.

9 a.m.

Conservative

Royal Galipeau Conservative Ottawa—Orléans, ON

Yes. That is my amendment.

9 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Michael Chong

Okay.

That's the amendment, so now we're discussing the amendment to the main motion.

Mr. Julian.

9 a.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP Burnaby—New Westminster, BC

Mr. Chair, we could just go over the motions one after another. I think that would be easier. We have nine at the moment, actually. I think that, if we look over the motions again, the first one will pass very easily and then we could come back to the question of procedure in the second.

9 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Michael Chong

We have a motion and an amendment to the motion on the floor. The proper procedure would be to dispose of them before we go to your suggestion.

9 a.m.

Conservative

Guy Lauzon Conservative Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry, ON

I could withdraw the original motion, because it's getting too complicated. Maybe we should go--

9 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Michael Chong

Okay.

9 a.m.

Conservative

Guy Lauzon Conservative Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry, ON

If that's doable.

Sorry about that.

9 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Michael Chong

Technically, you can't withdraw motions from the floor.

Do I have unanimous consent to defeat both the subamendment and the main motion?

9 a.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

9 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Michael Chong

They're off the floor.

We're now going to do this differently. We'll start with the first routine motion. Do I have a mover of the routine motion?

It's moved by Mr. Bélanger. Is there any discussion on the routine motion as it's presented on this sheet of paper?

Here's what it says: “That the committee retain, as needed and at the discretion of the chair, the services of one or more analysts from the Library of Parliament to assist it in its work.”

Is there any further discussion? Seeing none, I'll call the vote.

All those in favour?

(Motion agreed to)

9 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Michael Chong

We'll now go to consideration of the adoption of the second routine motion. It's the routine motion concerning the subcommittee on agenda and procedure. Is there a mover for this particular motion?

9 a.m.

Conservative

Royal Galipeau Conservative Ottawa—Orléans, ON

It's not what is written here.

9 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Michael Chong

I'd like you to move what you would like to move. Would you please read it into the record?

9 a.m.

Conservative

Royal Galipeau Conservative Ottawa—Orléans, ON

I move that the subcommittee on agenda and procedure be composed of five members, including the chair, the two vice-chairs, the parliamentary secretary, and a member of the government party.

9 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Michael Chong

So we have a routine motion on the floor to adopt, concerning the subcommittee on agenda and procedure.

Mr. Galipeau has proposed that the subcommittee be composed of the chair, two vice-chairs, the parliamentary secretary, and a member of the government. So there would be three government members and two opposition members on this committee. One of the three government members would be the chair.

Is there any discussion?

Monsieur Bélanger.

9:05 a.m.

Liberal

Mauril Bélanger Liberal Ottawa—Vanier, ON

Mr. Chair, I feel that Mr. Galipeau's exact words are important. He said: “un membre du parti gouvernemental”.

9:05 a.m.

Conservative

Royal Galipeau Conservative Ottawa—Orléans, ON

I said “du parti ministériel”.

9:05 a.m.

Liberal

Mauril Bélanger Liberal Ottawa—Vanier, ON

Right, but that does not mean a member of the government. I think that is quite an important distinction that should be reflected in the motion. If it is a member of the government, it would have to be another parliamentary secretary.