I'm going to ask a brief question, and then I'll give Mr. Harris part of my five minutes so that he can ask one in turn.
Earlier Mr. Lévesque talked about literacy and long-term programs. Your program is under the responsibility of Human Resources and Skills Development Canada. We know that Human Resources and Skills Development Canada is also responsible for employment insurance. I'm coming back to that subject because manpower training programs now enable people to go to college and to receive two years of benefits as though they were employment insurance claimants. They are allowed to finish their two years of university and to receive employment insurance benefits.
Do you think it would be good for the government to consider including literacy in that? That's the base, the start. If 66 people have a literacy problem, they will definitely have trouble finding a job. So rather than deny them, we should enable workers who lose their jobs to take literacy courses and then to go to college. We initially deny them that opportunity. We tell them that, if they haven't completed grade 10, they can't take part. They're all disqualified. The only thing they can do is take evening courses, but that's too slow and they don't go right to the end.
Do you think it would be a good idea for Human Resources and Skills Development Canada to allow that, either under the Roadmap or in the context of its programs? In either case, it's still the same money: taxpayers' money. Do you think it would be preferable to offer that kind of program rather than have an individual claim employment insurance, especially seasonal workers who we know may not have work until the following spring.