I am switching back to French now. This question is for all three groups. It comes back to the level of involvement in future consultations in relation to past assessment processes.
If I understood correctly, Ms. Williams seemed to be saying in her presentation that the people at the BCRC would really like to be involved in the consultations and in the program assessment processes that follow.
The AFFC representatives talked about how difficult it was to determine which investments really came out of the roadmap because of all the overlap with Canadian Heritage.
Would helping to develop assessment indicators to measure outcomes and success allow you to address some of the shortcomings when it comes to the transparency and relevance of roadmap initiatives? The question is for all of you. Please keep your answers brief, as I don't think I have much time left.