I can say that, ultimately, long-term funding of an organization is more cost-effective. We know that. In fact, we cannot guarantee to some of our employees that they will be with us next year.
I have an analogy, if I may. Let's imagine a brand new residential district—which are now common—where all the trees are ripped out, and so on. If someone is moving there for a year, but perhaps no longer than that, they probably won't take the time to improve the grounds or do any landscaping in order to live in a nice community. That will not necessarily be the case. However, if other neighbours know that they will be there for a long time, they will get more involved.
All to say that, if we could afford to give our employees contracts for more than one year, we could become more consistent. We could also save on the cost of recruiting and everything that goes with it.