Okay then, as long as you let me dive right in. Thank you very much for your question.
We pointed this out in our presentation. The roadmap is a broad concept, and I also think that it is not very well known on the ground. It is usually done at the national level and it goes directly to the interested organizations, to provincial organizations. It is like there was a national organization with subsidiaries—and that often takes place outside pre-established processes—such as advocacy organizations. We have to ask people what they got. Those organizations often don't even know whether the money came from the roadmap.
Perhaps the roadmap doesn't sell itself very well, though it may do things that take place on the ground. For example, we have talked about translation scholarships in our report. I am very familiar with that because I was the dean of a faculty. So I knew that the funding came from the roadmap, just like the $1 million for the digitization of translation programs at the University of Saint-Boniface, but it was sort of a piecemeal approach.
That is why we are saying that, in the next roadmap, it is important to find a way to circulate information and make it as clear as possible for both advocacy organizations and the groups that benefit from it.
We have a problem when a group receives money and they don't know if it comes from the roadmap, as you said. For example, we can see that infrastructure programs were happening everywhere . But we see nothing that says that it comes from the roadmap. So there is certainly work to do to make the roadmap better known as something that makes things happen, that brings about change, we must admit, but that essentially is not very well known.