Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I think my comments are totally relevant to the amendment and the motion. I am repeating that because we might have lost track since I began speaking. My argument is very clear. I am trying to show as clearly as possible that I am at a loss. Our government says it wants a policy of openness. For that reason, it has equipped itself with clear instruments that promote this openness—Hansard being one of them. However, that same government is proposing a motion on in camera proceedings.
I will continue:
Hansard provides other information, name and political affiliation, the first time a member takes the floor that day [...]
I will not read all the examples.
Given the bilingual nature [...]
In that case, if there is no....