It made me jump. It made my hair stand on end.
Mr. Gauthier, you said that your department really looked at the work done by this committee and considered all the testimonies given here and viewed it as a formal study. You said that you were going to do another, more informal study.
Here's what concerns me in all that. Unless I'm mistaken, when we did the study, the question was whether the roadmap was working. We asked our questions with that in mind. We did not ask what should happen in the future. If the consultation and this committee are off track, wouldn't it be better to do a study with the communities, that the government meet with communities to really find out if what was done worked?
Since you follow the committee meetings, surely you'll agree with me that the message is clear: the roadmap was positive. Is that what you understood from the testimony?