For a number of months now, week after week, we have heard from a lot of people who come and testify about their experience in the various communities. It appears that this testimony, gathered over months, will constitute a significant portion of the report, indeed the entire final report.
How could we make the report, which the committee must produce at the end of its proceedings, credible with regard to the actual evaluations? Do you have any suggestions to give us for drafting purposes?
I'll give you two examples. This morning, we received a report from Health Canada. The approaches it contains are quite clearly established. In one column, there are the expected results, in a second column the performance indicators and details on those indicators. I get the impression that it is easy to navigate. There is a happy mixture of statistics and hard facts.
As the Standing Committee on Official Languages has heard witnesses, what would our report be lacking in order for it to be relevant?