In my first comment, I didn't think I was crying wolf; I just wanted to point out that a situation had occurred, that it should not have occurred and that we have to figure it out.
In Mr. Galipeau's last comment, I must admit that things were heating up a bit more. I can guess that that's not what you were trying to say. You are saying that the report was submitted in both official languages, but the notes weren't. To me, that's a slippery slope. If we start thinking that the report being in both official languages is an acceptable and reasonable compromise and that we should not be too greedy—that's what a number of people might understand from an expression like that—I think the slippery slope is dangerous. I don't want us to get into these types of comments or this type of debate, but I do just want us to clarify something that happened and that should not have happened.