As I was saying, the 42% decrease takes place over a six-year period, going back three years and going forward for three years. Within that percentage, there are permanent reductions and the ending of so-called temporary initiatives. Two examples would be the Vancouver Olympics and the Shanghai Expo. There were also resources transferred to other departments, for example, the consolidation of shared services. One has to be careful since the 42% includes all of that.
If we are talking about permanent resources for which I have a more specific number, that would be around one third of these. In all the choices we have made, whether that be transforming or centralizing priorities, we ensured there would be no major significant repercussions on client service. Not one dollar was cut from programs.
Finally, with respect to official languages, we went about it the same way. The positions we plan to eliminate from official languages are management positions we will be eliminating, while consolidating responsibilities and protecting the program's administrative resources. Once again, we wish to maintain our service standards for the recipients of these programs and ensure clients do not see a difference. The reason for which...