I think that it is important to make the distinction between operations and the service offering on one hand, and promotion on the other.
I cannot see how a $5,000 contribution agreement for a cultural group in Havre-aux-Maisons in the Magdalen Islands could involve the requirement to operate in both languages. I think that this is first and foremost a question of scale. When a group is given a lot of money because they are carrying out a big project, then it is important to be inclusive. It is important that the government seek to promote some small, unifying community events. It would then be even more worthwhile to emphasize the importance of promoting linguistic duality and thus achieve a balance between these two things.
The federation makes an effort to make our events accessible to young people who are not necessarily fluent in French. However, we clearly operate in French, and that is important for us. That being said, we promote linguistic duality at our events. We need to find a balance between these two elements. Every dollar does not have to be associated with a requirement to operate and provide services in both languages. It should depend on the context.