Our position at the QCGN has always been that federal responsibility follows federal money, so the Official Languages Act follows federal money. Now, in our own specific position or circumstance, you can understand how sometimes that position is difficult in practice. The argument would be that all federal payments to Quebec carry with them the requirement of delivery of services in English, so there are problems, but as a point of principle, federal money carries with it federal responsibilities.
However, if I take off that hat for a minute and put on the hat of a person who works for a community sector organization, do we want to put bilingual requirements or linguistic clauses on organizations whose purpose is to promote and create an environment in which one of our official languages can be nurtured and grown? If a francophone community sector organization wants to do something to celebrate the 150th anniversary of Confederation in Alberta, do you want to put a bilingual requirement clause in one of their grant contributions? I would suggest probably not, because what you're trying to do there is create a space for one of our official languages to be spoken and to be experienced, and to create an environment where it's safe to do so; to now introduce the requirement to speak English in that same project seems to defeat the purpose of the organization in the first place.
That's a tough question.