Thank you.
I guess I'm just thinking about Mr. Galipeau's comment. I come from the world of the arts. I'm an actor. I've done a massive amount of theatre in my life. Theatre doesn't pay. It doesn't pay you as an actor, and it doesn't pay theatre companies, but it's extremely important because that live contact with an audience is something you'll never get in film and television. When I go out into schools, I say it's like the difference between buying Justin Bieber's CD and seeing Justin Bieber live. They get the difference.
Although I understand the pragmatism of it, I'm a bit concerned, I guess, about the reliance on technology. I'm fine with social media and so forth and everything else, but there's nothing like being able to walk into a museum and see a Van Gogh hanging on the wall. You can look at the picture. There's nothing like walking into la Maison-Riel or Laurier House and being able to tangibly ask questions of an individual, who can then give you answers.
I'm a bit concerned about whether or not the technology is going to drive people away from visiting sites. If you can look at it on YouTube, then what, as we say in theatre, will get more butts in the seats?
How is Parks Canada addressing that?