I hope so, given that 40% of employees are already bilingual, which did not used to be the case. That's why I am a bit confused about one of your main priorities.
I am absolutely in favour of promoting linguistic duality, enhancing the vitality of official language communities and ensuring the sound management of the commissioner's office. But given the statistic you cited—the fact that 40% of new public servants are already proficient in both of our country's official languages—why are you so concerned? Why did you again decide to focus on the impact of the budget cuts? The reality is that both languages will come out stronger. That's not in line with the overall vision your other three priorities fit into. Could you kindly clarify?