In fact, since you used the words “Whereas the Constitution provides“, I assume that the wording was drawn wholly, or almost wholly, from the Constitution.
My second question has to do with clause 2 and the part that says “without the aid of an interpreter”.
Suppose that an officer of Parliament has an accident and takes a few months off, but he has a hearing problem when he comes back. That can actually happen after an accident. From time to time, he might need an interpreter or a special device. In fact, even with the assistance of an interpreter, he might have trouble understanding certain sounds, which could prevent him from understanding certain words correctly in both his first and second language.
What should we do in a case like that? Should we fire him, although he has all the skills required to keep his position and he still has five years before his mandate expires?