Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
It should be remembered that French-immersion schools by law are English-language schools. Thus any limitations that might be imposed by Bill 14, we would suggest, are pertinent.
We would start on Bill 14 by reminding you that our raison d'être and something we have not frankly succeeded in having completely understood, as Madam Stein Day noted, is that we are agents of francization. Believe me, we know our other core roles as well. We're agents of francization and French immersion is one part of that. Very often those who we are succeeding in rendering capable and conversant in French are not going to get those skills otherwise. They're going to be looking for work. That's one part of it. We would start with the law in its entirety putting our system at risk.
Quickly on the military, I think it's important to note that we sought the intervention of all three federal party leaders on that matter because the military is a federal jurisdiction. We didn't receive any satisfaction on that.
We are deeply preoccupied by Bill 14. The other thing it does is that it sets further requirements for the right to work in French, which we respect, but the protections by all assessments are there already. Will that hurt our own workforce within our schools? We have worries about that. I just wanted to make those points on that matter.
The notion of the students we get to put in French immersion, in other words our overall numbers, while there continue to be risks, some that are inevitable....
Mr. Dion, you talk about the natural mobility of our community. That is normal. One of the things that's encouraging to us, and the federal government could help on, is that, as we mentioned, we think it absolutely normal and pertinent to remind other Canadians and people around the world through our embassy network and other means that it is good and possible to move to Quebec and be part of the minority language community, thus part of our schools, thus part of our French immersion programs.