That is what I would like to see. It is my hope that the incidents described in the annual report will be used to establish better practices. The idea is not to embarrass those who had poor results and commend those that had good results; rather, it is to identify practices that worked. That could include creating conversation groups in certain departments, so that employees have a chance to maintain their language proficiency, a structural change, better communications between official languages champions in the departments and the steering committee, and so on. It all depends on the nature of the problem that is identified.
On October 25th, 2011. See this statement in context.