I would answer in this way with a couple of examples. We're very happy with the work that the Quebec economic development program does in Quebec because it is worked by project. So when Youth Employment Services asked to have a project with the Gaspé and with the Voice of English-speaking Québec, to work together on the employment of English-speaking communities in those regions, it worked. It is a fabulous success because the projects were conceived and designed and implemented with the money. They were conceived on the ground and really did come from a grassroots' understanding of what needed to be done, both in Quebec City and Gaspé. When you have that kind of design to a program it is excellent.
Where it doesn't work as well is with a more top-down approach with programs, where departments will think that this is the way to go and say, “If you want the program, this is the way it's going to go.”
More community involvement in the program is the key to success. I don't know if I've answered your question, but it's excellent money. I think with literacy programs it's the same thing. The partnership at the base working with a department gives us results. I would answer the question that way. When we see too much top-down it doesn't work as well.
In our community a few years ago the Commissioner of Official Languages did a—