It's not systematic. We have worked together on a number of initiatives. We have signed protocol agreements separately with Ontario and New Brunswick, so if somebody files a complaint with one of us that should go to the other, it gets transferred automatically. We don't say to a complainant, you're wrong, that's in provincial jurisdiction. We have taken on the responsibility of ensuring that any complaint goes to the right office.
We had ongoing discussions among the three of us about the study we're doing on immigration. Katherine d’Entremont, my colleague in New Brunswick, felt that the nature of New Brunswick's situation was sufficiently different from the communities outside Quebec and the rest of the country that she was in an urgent situation. New Brunswick has 32% francophones, 12% francophone immigration, and she is arguing quite vigorously with the provincial government that they've got to go from 12% to as close to 30% as they can. Citizenship and Immigration Canada has announced that they are moving the target from 4% to 5% for immigration. That's not a useful conversation for New Brunswick to embark on. It was not from a lack of desire to collaborate that she decided not to be engaged in this particular study. I saw her last week when I was at this judges training program for provincially appointed judges in Caraquet and Shippagan, and we made a joint presentation on our roles to the judges in this training program.
I similarly have periodic conversations with François Boileau in Ontario. It's not as though we have monthly meetings or anything of that kind, but when issues come up if I'm visiting the province I try to make sure that I'm in touch with them. If they're coming to Ottawa they get in touch with me, our staffs are in contact.