At this time, we can take a limited number of concrete actions, apart from the actions that enable us to conduct investigations and audits and ensure the implementation of recommendations. Take Air Canada, a repeat offender. We're all very familiar with the issue. In the case of this federal institution, the commissioner doesn't necessarily have the tools to make significant changes.
For 50 years, we've been conducting investigations and follow-ups. We must ask ourselves whether we've been able to change the behaviour of federal institutions. Do we have the necessary tools to change certain behaviours?
In the end, when we talk about federal institutions such as Air Canada or airport authorities, we want to know whether the institutions have changed their behaviour.
Among all the federal institutions, some are very compliant with the commissioner's recommendations. Perhaps the same compliance mechanisms applied to all federal institutions should be set out for Air Canada in the act.