In terms of having a strong act and linking principles with practical aspects, that does in fact pertain to governance and possible compliance mechanisms. Right now, the act gives the commissioner significant investigation powers, but says practically nothing about following up on our recommendations.
Moreover, in terms of having a dynamic act, it is very important to understand that the act can evolve. For example, new technologies play an important role in the provision of services and communications. How can we make sure the act can evolve so that it remains technologically neutral? Right now, we have to review part IV, which sets out the obligations regarding communications with the public and the provision of services. The issue of justice in French is also extremely important.
Of course, we should perhaps create a regulatory framework for part VII, which is not clear enough. There are other examples related to these three priorities, but these are practical examples.