I'm going to answer by raising two points.
First, we're obviously in complete agreement on the "by and for", but we're taking it further and making it "by, for and with". We don't want the government to just send us money for projects and then tell us they aren't what it wanted. If we start working together more, in a much more comprehensive way, by and for the community and with the governments and the various stakeholders, we'll have a far better chance of producing a result that's satisfactory for everyone.
Second, to respond to your comment, Mr. Samson, I would say that, yes, arts and culture are important, but we must not forget areas of activity where arts and culture are important. If culture is a community's identity, that identity automatically changes when new people arrive. So that includes immigration. Culture in education is important—I know you know that—but culture can also be a way to integrate newcomers. Culture also has a role to play in health.
I think arts, culture and cultural industries must be acknowledged as an important element, at least in the preamble to the act.