Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
I'd like to go back to the Gascon judgment. That judgment really shook up all the communities across Canada as a result of the judge's interpretation of part VII.
I appreciated the fact you said that he had made an interpretation that differed from yours and that it was not what legislators wanted at the time.
Part VII must be revised, of course. In particular, we're talking about positive measures, which are not defined.
How do you think those positive measures should eventually be defined?