Exactly. It would be preferable to do that rather than wait for a court decision that defines or doesn't define what a positive measure is.
Appealing Judge Gascon's decision is one thing, but that doesn't prevent the government from finding a solution to define what constitutes a positive measure.
I've seen that too often in my own province, where the government's argument is that, since the matter is before the courts, the government can't touch it. However, I don't accept that argument. On the contrary, I believe that, even though it's before the courts, we can continue working to improve the way we interpret what constitutes a positive measure.