So the government is acting in bad faith in the matter.
I want to talk to you about something else that is also a great concern, in my opinion. The Alliance nationale de l'industrie musicale, ANIM, is another public matter—which is why I am talking to you about it. The alliance also issued a media release saying that its request is public.
You produced a first preliminary report in March 2018, which criticized the fact that Part VII of the act is not being upheld in terms of the contribution by SiriusXM Canada. In its release, ANIM says this:
Very recently, in February 2019, ANIM was devastated to receive from the commissioner an amended report on the investigation into its 2013 complaint. Mr. Théberge is doing an about-face on his decision from a year earlier and finds that the complaint is without foundation.
This is another complaint that goes back a very long time.
Does it happen often that a complaint first has a foundation and then, because things happen, it no longer does? Is this the only case? Do you often decide first that a complaint is founded, conduct an investigation and make recommendations, and then do an about-face thereafter?