To answer your question objectively, I would say that the funding available was spent effectively. We can say that because we have two full years to refer to, plus a third that will be over in a few weeks.
Jean-Pierre will give you the exact number. In the second year, I believe that 95% of the anticipated expenses were spent on the objectives as set out in the roadmap's original documents.
Some initiatives took time to get going in some departments, because they took more time to launch them than was anticipated at the start. We did what we call a carry-forward, which involves pushing funds from one year into the following year.