One of the things that we know for your consideration in looking at the road map is that the first action plan and subsequent road maps have not had quid pro quos for the work that cannot be done in Quebec. An example is immigration.
In the title of the last road map, the three pillars were immigration, education.... Immigration means the English-speaking community is not there. If we could ask one thing of your consideration around the next road map, and we will be asking the minister the same thing, it is that the activities and funding proposed within the different departments consider that in Quebec some things work better than others. When you talk about immigration, we have the same concerns as the francophones in the rest of Canada around growing or giving vitality to our community. If we can't do it through immigration because of the accords, because of Quebec, then we have to find another way.
There's a great interest in early childhood education. If that is not possible in Quebec, what's the quid pro quo? The frustration is not just about this, but over the past many years of action plans and then road maps and evaluations of those exercises. The evaluations are saying what the programs are giving, but the evaluations are not considering the gaps in the programming. We are telling you what the gaps in the programming are because the evaluations are just considering the programs.