It's a very interesting question. I mentioned that there are two populations, two needs, that have been identified in the study. In one of the sectors, there's very little need for information, and a lot of the foreign students coming to Canada for advanced legal studies, for instance, would be in a group that requires less intervention. They very often want to use the bijuridical model in Canada to import certain very interesting notions into their countries, perhaps because they are now faced with common law and with international commerce coming into a more civilian jurisdiction. It would be difficult to keep these people in Canada, because they come here to get knowledge they can use in their own countries, and that's a very positive import for Canada.
In the second population, those with higher needs, the problem is not that they go away after their studies. The problem is that they don't access all the fields of justice. We need to give them information from a very young age to tell them justice is an interesting area to get into. We need to dispel some of the negative myths that could exist in those communities because of perhaps negative interactions with the authorities and convince them to be in this field and be an example to the younger members of their community. The issue is not them leaving; it's just entering that field of education.