Very much, actually.
In his member statement in the House of Commons today, Mr. Samson talked about immigration. I think that immigration and economic development are very important issues. It's clearly an important issue in minority francophone communities. There were objectives that the provinces and the federal government failed to achieve, so it's important to review those objectives.
Getting back to the motion we're discussing, it's about access to justice in general. That's fine. I myself am a lawyer for minority communities. However, if we put too many irons in the fire, we'll get distracted. Before we put our irons in the fire, we should discuss this amongst ourselves a bit more and take a little more time. I understand the idea behind the motion, but we have been striving for consensus since the beginning. Can we carry on like that? Clearly, access to justice is an issue, but we have to decide how many things to prioritize. Are we going to have five priorities? Seven? Three? Four?