Yes, but with all due respect, we are not studying the possibility of reducing obligations. That is not what is at stake at all. The other carriers may do so, but on an exceptional basis. We can say that there have been some improvements, I agree, but we are not studying the possibility of reducing an obligation. This worries me considerably.
The second point I'd like to raise has to do with the decision in Thibodeau v. Air Canada, and with the whole issue of the Montreal Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air. I know that my former colleague Stéphane Dion had introduced Bill C-666.
What is your department's thinking on this?