Okay.
I said this during an exchange with Paul Gaboury in Le Droit. When we look at the decline in the Translation Bureau's staffing levels over several years, we have to ask the question: is it to replace humans? There are humans behind the tools. Are the tools being used only to replace translators?
Once again, I come back to the idea that everyone thinks translation is important. That's why people want tools. At the same time, why is a translation tool used to replace translators, while an accounting tool isn't used to replace accountants?