Yes, I'll share it with Mr. Fergus.
I'd like to thank the witnesses for being here today.
You make a few strong conclusions with the title of your brief: “Linguistic duality imperiled by utilitarian logic in the federal public service.”
Mr. Delisle, you said, “Francophones in this country will reject cost savings and productivity as excuses to relegate their language to the ranks of technobabble.” Those are strong words.
You also said that, in your opinion, the purpose of this technology is to replace humans.
What are you basing this statement on? Is it a fact, or are you assuming that? Where does that comment come from?