I'm speaking in general here because that's the heart of this debate. The question that's being asked is: Can we give good quality information at low levels of geography from the one in four sample part of the survey? There are so many programs already in Canada that use that information to make important decisions. It isn't just a homogenous population; it's heterogeneous or homogeneous. We do that. That's what we do all the time. That's what the science of the statistical rigour is. We want to make sure that we provide that detailed information to everybody.
The last point I'll make is that if you think that's theory.... I was just asking colleagues how many times people went those local levels. We had over 12 million visits to our census profiles that provide information at that very local level. We know we're providing it, we know it's of high quality and we know Canadians are consuming it.